لیست تیم ملی ایران برای جام جهانی 2026

Cyruss. Honar nazd e Iranian ast o bas.

Geez shahin that looks yummy

 

فقر طبقاتى إيجاب ميكنه كه ما بهً805 بسنده كنيم

Winning the cup or events by the host nation have always been subject to controversy. Shit happens and I don’t doubt it. The hosts millions time after time , so a little home field/ court advantage shouldn’t be surprising.

 

But my issue is looking at this so one sided. Didn’t we do it before when we had the chance of hosting? So many stories of “ our hosting “ that didn’t go well with our competitors.

 

1968. Israelis felt cheated. Before that Burma was complaining about one sided officiating in favor of Iran

 

1976-Kuwait was unhappy about officiating

 

In koshti many of our world level medals were questionable

 

1974 Asian games- Sepahbod hojat , then chief of Tarbiat badani, at the midst of Asian games, lobbied to chang the rules to count the number of medals in team sports by number of team members, hence our 2 golds in waterpolo and football became 35! And we finished ahead of China in the standings. For the first and last time!

 

 

Yes, we have also been victims of seemingly unfair situations and calls.

 

But it is my observation that not many make such a fuss about these situations except middle eastern, particularly Iranian and Iraqis.

 

 

Sometime in 80s I was in Netherlands with a group of friends. We encountered a group of young Iranian men ended up having beer with them. The subject of football was naturally introduced and 78 WC.

 

The Iranian guys were more vociferous and emotional in accusing Argentina of having cheated to the WC title. Valid subject. But the level of anger shocked the Dutch friends! They could care less. It was forgotten. To them , it was about moving forward

So the worst team of round of 16 in AFCON, Ivory coast the host wins the tournament. And the best team of round of 16, Qatar the host wins the Asian Cup.

 

The surprise here is Qatar😂

"If I was the ref I would have called that a penalty and then let the VAR correct me. It was a close one."

 

But KAmkAr. Your angle and my angle is from TV. Ref happened to be right there. The other thing ref goes by is the angle the ball is moving after the incident. And the route the ball took could have only happened if Qatari player touched the ball.

 

Anyways Faghani said he whistled in favor of iran. 1) Not calling the Pk (VAR had to interfere) and Faghani said even after VAR it was not a PK. 2) giving only yellow to Shoja (and VAR had to convince him to give Shoja a red).

 

These are not signs of biased ref.

Cyruss: As I said before I am not comfortable with damet garm club but damet garm 

What moozigari? 

Yes we do want our team win because of sense of pride which will dissipate in 2 days. The opposite is true as well when our team loses but human tend to look for emotional high all the time but this is at least relatively harmless if you can move on from it quickly.

Best news today is my son not going to watch the game with bunch of buddies in a bar in SF and come home to watch it with me. My daughter will be around as well for Taylor. My wife will be out shopping though

Go 49 YEARS!!

Shahin. Speaking of Super Ball, my friend in Bay Area still thinks they are called 49 Years😂😂😂😀😂.

 

Hopefully everyone knows why they are called 49ers. If they don't I am not surprised. 😀

سیروس جان. مشکل بعضی‌ها فهمیدن نیست، ترس از فهمیدنه.

That is what shahin calls bubble and how outside of the bubble is so scary for them. 

شاه غلامو‌ میخوام ببرم سوپر بول ببینه.

 

BTW it is Super Bowl and not Super Ball. 😂😂😂

KAmkAr

 

 

Again, here is how VAR works.

 

 

1- goal and offside review is done by goal line and offside line technology and does not require Ref's review. Always. No ref review.

 

 

2- The whole 90 minutes is under meticulous review by VAR crew.

 

 

3- If anything requires more review they will let the ref know that something is under review. if the review is quick enough and obvious like the no foul on Taremi then they just continue.

 

 

4- if after review the decision is unanimous and in line with the call on the field they continue and they don't call ref for review.

 

 

5- if after review the decision is not unanimous (2-1 in a 3 person crew) or (3-2 in 5 person review) or if VAR crew unanimously are against the Ref's call, then they call the ref to come and look and make the final call.

 

 

The review in person by ref is for 1- Questionable handball pk inside 18, 2- questionable Foul PK inside 18, or 3- questionable red card. The ref is not required to review whether the foul occurred inside 18 or outside. That is done by line technology.

 

 

And lastly according to Faghani in Footbalitarin, All PKs in favor of Qatar were correct. He concluded that without the VAR interference the score would have been 1-1 in the regulation and with VAR it is 3-1 and that is the correct final score.