DC Aziz... DNC is going right, and attitude of Right Wings is not unknown to me...And I can even see the same attitude by some of my ex-liberal friends. As I said it could be Party loyalty or extremism in terms of ideology.

As this Admin taking Right Wing approach, (I am not the only one saying it as some expressed by many prominent democrats), the two groups above (ideologists and loyals) will also follow suit.

And as I said it is almost like we are back in early 2000 era and I am debating / arguing with bunch of right wing republicans. Since when arguing in favor of continuation of war and being in favor of escalation of war became a Democratic value?? and that is why likes of Cyruss who are more aligned with Democratic values are sitting this one out as they mentioned. Anything you say against it you are called, anti vaxer, Russian propaganda, Conspiracy theorist and....Pretty much echoing your CNN, abc, MSNBC, and your morning Joe.

In terms of debating and discussions, First of all I cannot debate with someone for example who just heard about Neocons, claiming "I don't think they exist", I can't participate in any discussions with them. Same for someone thinking Neocon was a Pokeman character. They leave no room for discussions. You in DC I am sure are aware of their existance.

Now as to your comments, You said something 180 degrees from what Harris said. Why do you say that? I know why, It was your natural reaction, like this cannot be. A war criminal has nothing to do with my Party as anyone with Democratic value should say. My expectation was as Trump denounced David Duke endorsement, Kamala Harris could have done the same with  endorsement of criminal Cheney. But in the world of Wokeism War criminals dont exist, Racists do. So if you are responsible for killing of 100s of thousands of people, and displacing millions of people, you are exempt in Wokiesm, only racism counts.

Again it can be Taa'sob, It can be you dont believe in what happened so you have to come to party's rescue to kind of clean it up. Or just in any other Ideaology like our own islam a mullah can justify anything even against the book.

Now, Mr. Liberal DC. You said:

"She said a bunch of stuff that would not pass my fact checking smell test". Great. But Mr. Liberal, Mr. Democracy, with the fact above, you did not even express what you said about fact check on this page. Mr. Democracy, Mr. Liberal, you did not even acknowledge that abc's fact checking "only against Trump" was not fair and was undemocratic.

Based on the the facts you wrongfully mentioned what Harris said "neither accept nor reject" and based on the fact that you indirectly admit that abc did not do fact checks on Harris (and you were ok with it), as a liberal, as a Democrat you lose all your credibility. And I can no longer call you as someone with Democratic value. Even though you do the DNC namaz roozeh everyday. Do a self check and make sure you are not deveating from your Democratic values.  

With that I end with

Wokeism 103: " X is a platform of misi-information, Dis-information, and Mal-information, But freak Dana Bash denying the fact that Tulsi Gabbard was on the terrorist watch list is nothing but the absolute truth"


He/ His / Him / AMAB / NDN / OIE

He told his wife that baby I am greater than Elvis

https://x.com/Acyn/status/1836553452463546436

Russian propaganda/ Right wing conspiracy theory.

 

 

ABC whistleblower claims he or she is in possession of secret recordings that will prove that ABC News rigged the presidential debate.'

 

 

An affidavit, purportedly from an anonymous "ABC News whistleblower," has sparked controversy after being circulated online. The document alleges close collaboration between the network and Kamala Harris’ campaign leading up to the recent debate against Donald Trump.

 

 

The affidavit was reportedly made the day before the debate and mentions details, like Harris' smaller podium, that only became public later."

The alleged whistleblower, whose name is redacted, claims to be an ABC News employee with knowledge that the network provided the Harris campaign with sample questions, promised the campaign it would only fact-check Trump and agreed not to ask questions on topics the Harris campaign deemed off-topic.

Anyways,  gotta be a hoax