Iranian Football Page - Since 1996

"The Official"
Iranian Football Page
Since 1996



Football News & Highlights

_________________________________________

World Cup 2026 North America - A Guide For Everyone

Real Time FIFA Ranking

Iran | The Road to World Cup 2026

فدراسین فوتبال
طرفداری
FC پرسپولیس
IRNA
IFP_Qods
FIFA
LiveScore-Iran
Live Soccer
Soccer TV
Football 360
Khabar Varzeshi
FC استقلال
فوتبالی
IFP_3
AFC
Live Score
Iran TV
لیگ آفتابه لگن ایران
فارس نیوز
Iran Varzeshi
Gol Bezan
ایپنا
ورزش ۳
تسنیم
IPL Stats
البرز ورزشی
جام تخت جمشید
مهر نیوز
خبرآنلاین
پرژین فوتبال
ایسنا
فوتبالیترین
ISP
رسانه گل
11v11
Team Melli Talk
Email IFP Admin
پارسی نویس
_________________________________________



<<< Post Message >>>
<<< پیام بنویسید >>>>


19,223 Entries
Saied 
April 30, 2025

Comments:
Farzad:  I expect you to have a more realistic perspective, being involved with US industry and travel to most places in the world.  There will be a small amount of manufacturing jobs coming back, but Bringing lot of manufacturing jobs to US is a pipe dream and nothing more.  There are several reasons; 10 High labor cost, 2) Lack of labor training, 3) supply chain.  How can you make such products competitive? And if they are targeting US market only, they better shut them down before they start.  Many part of the world has become anti USA, and those are not only hostile countries.  Places like Canada, Australia, Europe.  It is simply amazing how things change so quickly.  Two places that they are not hostile, Iran and Israel.  It is a shame that Iran is still under sanction, and Israel is too small!!!, otherwise Trump crazy idea may has had a chance!!


Farzad 
April 30, 2025

Comments:


Farzad 
April 30, 2025

Comments:


Farzad 
April 29, 2025

Comments:
Saeid, I am more confident on US economy.  China is a bad news and has been a bad news and has been known that since 2014.  Sooner or later we had to deal with them or otherwise simply let them loose to pass us by. The latter one not accepted by anyone.

Is there one way to get there? NO.  Did other approach work? NO, and we were not disciplined on some of the stuff we instituted.  

I think with the ongoing negotiations, bringing manufacturing in, removal of Trade Barriers, and fair trade we have a chance.  

JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs showed optimism today.

And Lastly, he does consult with Bill Clinton believe it or not which in my opinion was one of the greatest presidents in recent 1/2 century.  He was blackmailed by the Neocons unfortunately. Which was very nasty leading to his impeachment.  Supreme Court won the election for the Neocons in 2000 depriving Al Gore from winning. 


Farzad 
April 29, 2025

Comments:




Goaldoost  
April 29, 2025

Comments:


Saied 
April 29, 2025

Comments:

I am really concerned about the future of USA.  It is very much looking like a super power falling apart.  In the case of Russia, USA took over as the sole super power.  For the most part, thigs actually worked better.  This time around, things are different.  It seems China is the obvious choice, but you can not call them super power, at least military wise.  I do not think, they rely too much on USA market as before.  USA has only about 4% of world population.  Key is Europe, India, and Japan.   If China offer them a good deal, they would rather deal with China than a crazy admin in USA.
2028 can not come fast enough.


Farzad 
April 29, 2025

Comments:
His ultimate goal.  Will it happen? It would be very difficult.

Trump's Tax Vision: No Federal Income Tax Under $150K


Saeed 
April 29, 2025

Comments:
In conclusion, I do not believe things will change in Iran much, even with the deal being signed.  Dollar will be a little cheaper in short term, prices also.  But Iran continue to have problem long term as long as regime is in power.  For things to change for better, regime must be toppled by Iranian people.  There is no other way.  I believe, despite all the damages inflicted by mullahs, Iran still has potential to make a come back.  


Saeed 
April 29, 2025

Comments:
It seems deal between US/IRI is close.  I am saying this with certainty since both sides need it.  IRI does not have any other choice.  In fact, they view this as a god given chance to rescue them of the alternative, which is regime change.  It seems, Trump after all the fuss and tearing down the original deal, now accept it!! It is because, this is his only chance to say, I did some thing.  But how much sanction relief will be offered?  I believe, IRI will be allowed to sell oil.  Will that change regime behavior? Obviously, there are not much left of Hezbollah in Lebanon, or Hamas in Palestine.  The only party left are Huthies in Yemen.  will IRI resort to provide them assistance instead of spending the money to improve domestic programs to make life easier for people.  There are so many shortcomings in Iran, that they will not be able to address just with oil revenue.  They need foreign investment.  I believe, IRI does not have the trust of foreign community to start their investment.  


Farzad 
April 29, 2025

Comments:


Farzad  
April 28, 2025

Comments:


Farzad 
April 28, 2025

Comments:
Yeah agree. As I said these tariffs are just there as a tool for the countries to negotiate "trade deficits" and removal of "trade barriers". So as Bassnet said there will most likely be no tariffs and if any, it is balanced with removal of trade barriers and improving trade deficit. This will translate to exactly what you alluded to with U.S. savings in line with U.S. investments. Simple math.

The immediate relief is cutting the interest rate. 1/3 of the tax we pay goes to paying the interest on the debt. And that's really bad.


Saeed 
April 28, 2025

Comments:

With all the economical experts on hand in U.S, one wonder what the fuck, Trump is doing.  It is like letting a plumber, do a surgery on you.  Economy is a science, you can not do it with negotiation.   
He wants to end the U.S. trade deficit with tariffs. This is impossible—the only way to reduce the U.S. trade deficit is to bring U.S. savings in line with U.S. investment, which would occur, for example, if policies were enacted to balance federal, state, and local government deficits. So, not only are tariffs a futile avenue towards reducing the U.S. trade deficit, they risk eliminating two longstanding U.S. surpluses—its services and capital surpluses. In this trade war, any victory for the U.S. would be a Pyrrhic victory.

Steve H. Hanke is a professor of applied economics at the Johns Hopkins University and the author, with Leland Yeager, of Capital, Interest, and Waiting. Caleb Hofmann is a research scholar at the Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise.


Farzad 
April 28, 2025

Comments:
 

 < Previous 15
Page:
Next 15 >  

Back to Iranian Football Page